i just cant get the feel for the battlefield series im getting it for the single player like always but i will stick to the mw3 multiplayer.
and its not just battlefield even playing gow3 the other week didnt feel smooth to play maybes its because im getting old and cod fits my comfort zone that and the fact i cant offered to buy ever fps and dlc aswell so ive stuck with cod.
its i bit like a few years ago when they brought pes out it was either stick with fifa or try something new i tried it didnt like and stuck with fifa ever since
So Lets see the pattern here guys
W@W - JUG MP40 Lag Hit detection frame rate
MW2 - Hackers Boosters Noobtube Commando QuickScope Glitches like Javelin Care Package Speed dominated by air support Deathstreaks
BO - Lag Hit Detection Frame Rate Famas boring copy and paste guns
Support Killstreaks where deaths dont matter , 18 kills and 30 deaths don't worry here's your juggernaut or Osprey gunner drop to get you 20 kills
No recoil Insta kill no skill just like MW2
QuickScoping is back and more OP then ever
Same outdated engine
We have all been saying that BO is the same as MW2 but MW3 is an exact copy
Will have the same childish community that will abuse the many problems this game will have
New Next gen engine
13 huge amazing maps unlike CODs 13 or so and most suck
Vehicles drive your own Jet Apache Tank with your team and earn your kills instead of calling in an OP Chopper Gunner and shoot red squares
Ton of diverse weapons , Every gun feels completely different
Destruction No camping , Whats better then killing a guy by dropping a building on them or flattening an entire battlefield
Actual Recoil where aiming matters Not who saw who first
Dice is supportive , look at the support by 3arch and IW
BTW here's a near finished BF3 match on a new map on PS3
Amazing graphics none of the beta issues for you COD Noobs who don't know what a beta is
And here he is the true dumb ass fanboy.. If you really like BF3 so much go post **** like this on BF3 forums why do you come here? to prove what? that you are ignorant little boy? grow up. Stop trolling each game is fun in its own way. Personally me ill rather play glitched CoD game than BF3 its just not my style of playing.. but it dont mean i have to be an ass to everyone else..So here is an idea mister vise guy go play your BF3 and have fun leave us CoD players alone ok? have a good day.
Buy both games everybody. They'll both be good in their own respect.
Persongal Statement: BF3's beta rejuvinated my FPS skills. Why? Different playstyle makes you more aware.
COD gives me critical target acquisition and engagement experience.
BF gives me tactical awareness and emphasizes squad flanking tactics.
Unfortunately, both communities (including BF players) don't understand that you can like both franchises.
As a COD & BF veteran since COD1 & BF 1942, this so called "FPS war" really needs to stop.
Let Activision and EA ***** about who's better.
What's sad is that both DICE and IW/SH Games can get along, why can't the gamers?
We are all gamers at the end of the day. We play for our own enjoyment and support both developers who work their arse off to develop great games.
Just my thoughts.
You all need to SHUT THE @#$% UP about this. This debate is dumber than Artemis Fowl fanfiction. Which is pretty damn stupid if you know what I'm talking about. (if you don't know, keep it that way, unless you're a troll)
-The games aren't even out yet, so how can you judge?
-You might as well debate Halo vs. COD because both of the franchises have nothing in common besides being FPS games that take place in modern times
-Even if you do play them if you're a ninja or you went to CODXP & played the beta, you're both playing an extremley glitchy game that isn't the final game, and you're in the "video game honeymoon" phase
-The average COD fanboy just b*tches about the game and moans for nerfs. The average BF fanboy spends his days bashing threads on this forum and videos on youtube. Both of the fanboys are equally stupid
-If you love your franchise so much, why not go play it instead of debating a retarded topic?
This debate will never end. Idiots are basing BF3 off of the beta and think this is the final product.
The other side has morons thinking CoD is worse because of less authentic content or just the way it plays. Killstreaks, deathstreaks, certain attachments, etc. that holds more impact on games than the player's skill I can agree on, but nonsensical shenanigans are nothing to argue over.
I am personally not that excited for MW3 because of what has been shown and what it contains, but throwing out flawed statements and bias crap is a fail on your part. Especially when you have no idea what you are talking about.
I played the Old PS2 COD games, then rejoined the series when MW2 came out only to skip out on B-ops (bad move bc the hackers pretty much dominated MW2 online afterwards). I also do have expirience in BF 1942, but never progressed into the modern series's. There was some things about the gameplay in the BF3 beta that I enjoyed. it did take a lot more teamwork and it was cool to be able to pick which teammates you spawned with. Not to mention the destructable environments made for a very chaotic environment when you were in combat. I do think that they could have done the weapons a little differently. I like to be consistent with my weapons and use the same one every time, and I loved the ones that were brought to bear by the americans, but I couldnt use the AK47 or 74 to save my life. and the gameplay was much slower paced when you werent in combat, you had to make a long run just to get back into the combat area if you couldnt respawn on your teammates. CoD didnt have that problem for me. After bieng used to the controls of the COD series i found it hard to get adjusted to the new controls.
all in all BF3 beta was good but my money is still going towards MW3. if I had money and time to play both I would probably get both, but my choice just by past expirience is MW3.
Why is it BF3 against MW3? They're both good games in my eyes. Honestly I think BF3 will do better in sales than MW3. They are two totally different games with different styles. I'm not a fan of BF3. I think it is a good game in its own respect, but I just don't like the feel and style of it. BF3 fans will probably say I have no skill and I'm a noob, but the fact of the matter is the playing style of BF3 doesn't appeal to me. We could all debate all day and night which game is better, but it's more about what playing style and community you like better. The one thing I don't understand is all the die hard BF3 fans getting on here and bashing MW3. They're like a bunch of christians trying to convert Muslims. Just leave us alone and let us play the games we want.
You know who wins in a fight? BF3 or MW3?
Whoever has the most fun wins in any game vs game debate
You see, this isn't like books or movies. In a book or a movie, everybody experiences it the same way, generally (unless you are one of those people that thinks that Harry Potter is about homosexuality and that Lord of the Rings is about the Atom Bomb)
Fun is the reason why video games were built (also to teach us some basic morality and let the smart people that make them loads of money). Whoever is having the most fun wins (for game vs game, not people in game vs people in the same game)
It doesn't matter how good a game is. Just that you are having fun. Whoever has the most fun, wins. If some Black Ops fanboy is having 5x more fun than me when I play MW2, then he will think black ops is better because he's having more fun; even though I have more fun playing MW2.
Just enjoy your games and stop debating. If you have to resort to bashing games here to pass time, then obviously your video game is not very fun, so you should move on.
I've never seen a debate between the two sides? Its mostly a bunch of nerds trying to come onto a CALL OF DUTY forum and convince others that BF3 is better.
From what I heard, people who patrol this site and the BF3 site said that there are no MW3 fanboys over there trying to convince them that MW3 is better. So why do BF3 fanboys come over here?
fanboys are morons, regardless
Yes, but you must admit, the BF3 fanboys are being much more annoying in this situation. They have been swarming COD forums, news articles and blog postings for months now trying to bash COD and praise BF3. I give COD fanboys credit for not invading all the BF forums and doing the same thing. Not only have the BF3 fanboys been beating us over the head for months about how superior BF3 is, they also decide to insult us further when we play the beta and decide we just don't care for the Battlefield style of game. For a COD fan, BF3 is a slow boring game with less responsive controls and half the framerate. That, in a nutshell, is why 99% of COD fans will never switch to Battlefield. It may be a great Battlefield game, but the average COD fan has no use for it, and it's not helping at all when BF3 fanboys evangelize in our forums, and insult us when we express dislike for their game.
Well, CoD players mocked and made fun of BF in the past.
Consider this like "payback".
And people on these forums do the exact same thing of what the BF users are doing - bashing the other game. So it isn't one side just trolling the other side which is staying quiet.
Hell, you're doing it right now:
shadowthief wrote:For a COD fan, BF3 is a slow boring game with less responsive controls and half the framerate. That, in a nutshell, is why 99% of COD fans will never switch to Battlefield.
Most of the stuff you just said is totally subjective and down right wrong. 99%? Some on here are considering buying the game. They don't let a faceless character over the internet decide what they should buy because they are bashing CoD.
No we dont do the EXACT same thing. What we're doing is sticking up for the game that we love because its being attacked in a MW3 forum. A forum that just simply wants to talk about MW3 topics. We are NOT the ones going over there and dumping all over BF3 trying to convince them that MW3 is better.
There's a difference.