I would say BO1, not only wasn't it hard at all for me to get blackbird within a minute if not 30 seconds.. I mostly managed to carry the team, my map knowledge is beyond stupid, I could use anytype of gun (except snipers) and I would still beast and it wasn't that much of a big deal coming into the game late to reverse everything!
I'm now with BO2 at the side lines, I'm not the blackbird, swarm / dog type of player. To be honest, it's to hard, and for my playstyle it isn't fun. I go with UAV, counter and lightning strike. My k/d therefore is low, like 2.5
My mapknowledge isn't there yet and for sure I'm not the one who mostly carry the team, I'm not there yet.
As for other COD's, BO1 really did it for me thanks to Youtube to be honest. I was beasting in WAW, but looking back at it if I had the experience I had now!!!
MW3 easy, there was a shit ton of crap to abuse on that game even a noob could get a stealth, so for players like me that wern't half bad you could really screw with them
Are you playing objective gametypes?
My best game was probobly Modernwarfare 1, then black ops, then modernwarfare 3, then 2, then black ops II.
I was unstoppable in MW1. Black ops was also a beast, calling in multiple chopper gunner/dogs/blackbirds. Modernwarfare 3 brought specialist bonus, which when I got it with the silenced mp7 I was UNSTOPPABLE, getting multiple nukes a domination game.
I am playing my best in this game. I just started fps games bout 6 months into bo1. I had a wopping .82 in that game, a 1.1 in mw3 and now I have a 1.66 in bo2. I have finally got map awareness and accuracy is getting better every day. Now I just need to win more gunfights and my game would be complete. My reflexes aren't what they used to be so I have changed my playstyle to use an ar and attack from mid-range and try to stay away from extreme cqc when I can because in this game I find it harder since the players move so fast. I'm happy with my 1.66 because I realize how far I have come and the fact that I run support streaks and pto always. If I ran lethals I would probably have more kills.
MW2 (lowest k/d) was the COD i had the most fun on with BO1 (highest k/d) close behind it.
I have been very consistent through the years
COD3 50,000 kills and about 4,000 wins
COD4 1.50 K/D 1.50 W/L 70,000 kills
waw 1.70 K/D 3.50 W/L 110,000 kills
MW2 1.50 K/D 6.00 W/L 120,000 kills
Blops 1.60 K/D 7.00 W/L 20,000 kills---Hated this game
MW3 2.15 K/D 11.00 W/L 95,000 kills
Blops2 1.80 K/D 3.50 W/L 38,000 kills
With a name with that. You will think you will do better.
(disclaimer: Not trying to rub you the wrong way. Just had to say it)
What is bad about the numbers? 99% of my games are objective based and not kill based. So i die alot taking a HQ or capping a flag in Domination. I still put up big numbers game after game and you will notice by my W/L i dont loose much.
Was not serieus. You got good stats overall. Most people are only focussed on that k/d stat.
All those self proclaimed "pro's" all have 4.00 + k/d. With dashboarding etc.
Yeah can care less of K/D. W/L is what matters imo. When it comes time to bearting up the greenies and going 80+ i do it just if not better than those 4.00 k/d players