Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

SOLVED

Call of Duty Ghosts General Discussion

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

It's CoD fatigue.  Both Mega and otis above mentioned this too.

I may or may not get it eventually (probably will get it as a gift, my family knows I like CoD.)  But, playing BOII last night I asked myself would I be having more fun if I was playing Ghosts if for no other reason, it's at least a new title with new maps, weapons, etc.  I was thinking this because I was getting a liitle bored playing BOII. 

I may prove myself wrong if I end up playing Ghosts and find that I like it, but I felt that I was bored not because of the maps or weapons, etc., but because I was just kinda bored about the general CoD gameplay.  Same maps skills, same gameplay, same controls, same class of guns, you get the idea.  This is one of the reasons I didn't ensure I had it at release for the first time since BOI.

Along with this, there's the other issue of new releases having many technical issues (remember BOII crashed PS3's at release.)  And we see it now with Ghosts--just visit the Support Forum and you'll see there are glitches, errors and freezes galore. 

These are the reasons I'm glad I took a wait and see approach for the first time, again, since BOI.   

Level 40
Likes: 1881
Posts: 2922
Registered: ‎13-06-2013

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to otisman666

This game grinds you down, I have fun with other friends the most. Solo = the pits.

"We do not rise to the level of our expectations. We fall to the level
of our training"
Level 75
Likes: 9199
Posts: 16478
Registered: ‎14-11-2011

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to Yppecaye_the_Dogged

The only thing that really interested me was Extinction, so I went over to my friends house and played it. It was actually really boring lol, felt like you had a crapton of health. MP seems like the same-old same-old (which isn't necessarily a bad thing) but id rather just play BO1- so I do.

Level 35
Likes: 1042
Posts: 2824
Registered: ‎17-11-2012

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to Yppecaye_the_Dogged

I was going to wait and see, but when they announced dedis I was happy so I decided to get it on launch.

I have not been disappointed one bit.  Am I saying the game is perfect? Good lord no!  But for me, they put some attention to the #1 issue in the series for the past few years.

We can complain about OP guns

We can complain about colours and graphics

We can complain about gun sounds

etc...

But unless you address the matchmaking (which can seriously contribute to lag), you do not have a playable game (no matter how good it looks).  Because they have put some attention to that, I am glad I did not wait.  Have I experienced lag? yep... but nowhere (and I mean NOWHERE) near all the BS that was present in BO2 and MW3.

So far this game has played better for me than even BO1 (which now may no longer be my favourite).

Side Bar: This also has been the best launch in years. I feel that when they address some issues (which they are doing), this is going to be a decent game.

* started with PS3 version and upgraded to PS4 fyi

Activision Ambassador
Likes: 2663
Posts: 8427
Registered: ‎08-09-2011

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to Yppecaye_the_Dogged

I don't know. I rented the game - just as I promised I would - and played it for, apparently, 4.4 hours. I think that's the MP time because I did start the campaign and tinker around with other parts of it.

Am I glad I waited and have still put off buy the game?

Honestly, I'd rather play a badly constructed game than no game at all. But with COD, I know roughly what I'm going to get when I buy it. I really hated how MW3 started off playing extremely smooth, no lag, etc ... and then quickly devolved into crap for at least two months. But about mid-January, the kinks seemed to be gone for me and I enjoyed the game for the rest of the year.

BO2 played pretty smooth when I bought it a week after release and, from the technical aspect, I had no issues with the game ... until I went through the high sensitivity, no aim assist issue. That really turned me off of BO2 (as if I needed help to begin with) From a design perspective, I flat do not like BO2. Period. To the tune that I regret I bought the game at all. I could have just skipped it all together. Oh, no doubt - I did and will continue to have fun playing BO2. I guess it's kind of like getting a puppy for Christmas when what I really wanted was a Ferrari. I still love the little mutt (I'm being rhetorical - I don't have any dogs and I damn sure don't want any) ... but it's almost a forced love. Wow. That's always fun, right?

I do not like the challenge/mission/squad point design aspect of Ghosts. If I opt, ultimately, to not get the game after all - this will be the reason why. It does not at all feel like a finished game. I'm also greatly disappointed that I am forced to upgrade my laptop's OS if I want to look at the information Elite has provided us for 2 1/2 years. Why can't it be web-based like it has been in the past? I don't like that at all. My Windows XP works just fine. Best OS I've ever had. I don't want to upgrade it.

So ... yes, I'm glad I waited. The sad part is that, even though I enjoyed Ghosts much more than I did BO2 and like Ghosts design, overall, better than MW3 ... the longer I put off buying it, the less likely I am to buy it at all.

"At the end of the match, there remains only ... nuttin 2 say."
Level 62
Likes: 3467
Posts: 6218
Registered: ‎24-05-2011

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to nuttin2say

nuttin2say wrote:



BO2 played pretty smooth when I bought it a week after release and, from the technical aspect,




Except for crashing my PS3 at first, BOII ran quite smoothly for me.  I expericend a lot of lag issues with MW3, but at the end of its cycle I figured out how to tweek my connection and speed and when I started BOII, it worked wonders.  (It's no surpise to me that my BOII KD is a whole 0.7 or so higher than my MW3 KD.)

In hindsight, a wait and see approach would have avoided the crashing.  But if I didn't eventually buy the game, I would have missed out on the many hours of fun I had playing BOII MP.  BOII was far from perfect.  My standard is WaW.  I'm a proud WaW apologist and any title that varies too far from it is a "B", or worse, title.


So ... yes, I'm glad I waited. The sad part is that, even though I enjoyed Ghosts much more than I did BO2 and like Ghosts design, overall, better than MW3 ... the longer I put off buying it, the less likely I am to buy it at all.




This is how I'm feeling too.  The longer I don't have it, the more I'm losing that initial excitement and desire to have it.  Kinda not a bad idea anyway to wait until next year.  The game would seem new again, and maybe I'd have recovered from my CoD fatigue by then.

Level 40
Likes: 1881
Posts: 2922
Registered: ‎13-06-2013

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to Yppecaye_the_Dogged

COD fatigue. Yep. That just may be what it is. I play for the challenges and, honestly, I've only completed all the challenges on COD4. And I did that because I got tired of the hackers in WaW. Don't get me wrong - I LOVED WaW ... when there were not levitating super-snipers flying across the map. I still stick the disc in every now and then just to play MP. My bro and wife both like Der Riese on BO1 better than on WaW, but I love zombies on WaW the best - even without the ability to dolphin dive and even without a third gun.

Anyway, so yeah, I play for the challenges. I thought for sure the changes to the challenge system we got in MW2 would be good for the game ... but, frankly, it's been a flop since then. 2500 any-type kills is pretty easy. Getting 1000 headshots, in addition, is a complete joke. As we can see with BO2, less than 9% of kills are the result of headshots. I usually average about 9.8% to 10.1% headshots. That means an above average player has to score roughly 10,000 kills to complete the headshot challenges for over 30 weapons. It's not ever going to happen except for less than 0.5% of the community - if that. You look at the top of the leaderboards, you'd be lucky to find a single top 10 player with over 200k kills after a year's time.

Even the top players can't finish all the challenges.

With BO2 that changed a lot. I liked the challenge system for BO2 on one hand, but on the other I didn't. It only counts the things you've unlocked so if you pick up a weapon before you unlocked it, tough luck. That needs to further change. BO2 also felt like it had fewer challenges. In any case, they got the ratio right. Some guns I managed to complete all the challenges for the gun with well under 2000 kills. Most take around 2300 kills to complete all the challenges - including headshot challenges. I've not got a whole lot of primaries to finish. Frankly, I don't think the pistols will take a long time to complete, either. Big change and I did like that aspect of BO2

There's really not an emphasis for players to complete challenges in COD games. It seems counter-productive to encourage getting a higher prestige without a requirement to complete challenges. Personally, what would have been ideal to begin with would have been to keep the exact same challenges from WaW and COD4 but to require players to complete all of them before moving to the next prestige.

That would actually give meaning to prestige. As it is now, people whine "Oh, you're a 10th prestige and I'm just a 2nd prestige and therefore you're supposed to be better than me." BS. Prestige level does not indicate player skill in any way under the ongoing systems. It only indicates amount of time played - and not a good indicator at that.

The whole point of all this, in case anyone got lost in that rant - LOL - is that I'm trying to find a reason to NOT have COD fatigue. After six CODs, there seems to be no hope of ever "finishing the game." Well, if there is no way to complete every aspect of the game, then why bother trying?

That's why I'm looking to move over to PlayStation and just moving on to games that are more about personal customization instead of ... whatever COD has become. From what I see of the Ghosts challenge system, it's just more of the same thing. Well, if that's the case, why not just enjoy the last two years of my X360 trying to finish the challenges from the last five games? It's cheaper and those games are fun enough.

Sorry guys, but I'm just not interested in chasing another lost cause. I've gotten good enough to maintain respectable KDRs and WLRs. I've gotten nukes, I've gotten MOABs and I've max prestiged. There's challenges to the game, sure. But they are obtainable only on an isolated basis. There will people that respond to this thread with "I've completed this set of challenges or that set of challenges" blah blah blah. You didn't complete ALL the challenges (Maybe you did in BO2. Maybe). 500+ hours in-game by an above average player and not every challenge can be completed?

It may be time to move on, I'm thinking.

"At the end of the match, there remains only ... nuttin 2 say."
Level 62
Likes: 3467
Posts: 6218
Registered: ‎24-05-2011

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to nuttin2say

COD fatigue = playing far too much and realizing your done. And that happens allot, I feel it as well and stop playing for a day or two if necessary. Stepping away from COD is a good thing.

"We do not rise to the level of our expectations. We fall to the level
of our training"
Level 75
Likes: 9199
Posts: 16478
Registered: ‎14-11-2011
Highlighted

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to Izjar11

That is what's happening to me at the moment. I just don't feel like playing Ghosts anymore. It just the same thing over and over again. Maybe I'm just bored of COD in general.

Level 35
Likes: 1066
Posts: 3141
Registered: ‎27-03-2012

Re: Are Those Who Took the "Wait & See" Approach Vindicated?

in reply to Izjar11

Izjar11 wrote:



COD fatigue = playing far too much and realizing your done. And that happens allot, I feel it as well and stop playing for a day or two if necessary. Stepping away from COD is a good thing.



For me it'd take more than a few days.  More like months.

When I say "fatigue", I'm talking more about the general lack of interest, developed over time, in the game because all that make the game interesting, new and fun are played out; not so much just spending too many addictive hours and it's time to take a break.

Level 40
Likes: 1881
Posts: 2922
Registered: ‎13-06-2013

Studios