Encouraging Accuracy?

Ghosts General Discussion

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to OPStealthRecon

The problem here is you can't hold your aim long enough to get the kill. Core isn't just about who fired the first shot. It's about who can hold his aim more accurately to get the kill. You can fire first, get a hitmarker, lose your aim and get killed. I killed so many players even though they fired first. I'm a hard target. I strafe, I jump, I dropshot, and I'm pretty accurate. If your accuracy isn't so good, rest assured I will take you down even if you managed to fire first.

Run_N_Gunning_C
Likes: 1066
Posts: 3141
Highlighted

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to Run_N_Gunning_C

Yep, fire first kill first, is not how core was ever meant to play.

trialstardragon Level 70
Likes: 1950
Posts: 12882

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to trialstardragon

A lot of complaints on BO2 says they fired first yet they died first. I suspect they can't hold their aim and their target strafed out of their line of fire. They get owned and they take to the forums and complain the game is broken.

Run_N_Gunning_C
Likes: 1066
Posts: 3141

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to trialstardragon

trialstardragon wrote:



Yep, fire first kill first, is not how core was ever meant to play.


Yes, It was designed for corner jumping, bunny hopping, drop shotting health fairy shenanigans.

That's my opinion but it should be yours ;-),
RAN
RAN Kismet Level 75
Likes: 4356
Posts: 15072

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to RAN Kismet

No, it was designed for people who used tactics to move about and cause the attacker to loose aim and thus not do enough damage for the kill because they could not keep their target in their sights.

Aim first, fire first, kill first was never how Cod was meant until HC came about where guns killed in as little as 1-2 rounds. And that is the difference between core and hc. HC takes a greater level of accuracy and ability to remain on target than hc. Which is why most hc diehards cannot play core and do well and then cry it is broke. When really it is them that is broke because they lack decent aiming skills to follow the target as it moves.

trialstardragon Level 70
Likes: 1950
Posts: 12882

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to trialstardragon

first off all hc exists since call of duty 2 or even 1 so it was always there so its not correct to say since it came ... i wanted to correct this misconception...  and then HC is a far more realist game mod than Core ever was or will be so please stop bitching about ppl crying they are not all crying i own both hc and core you just have to adapt to the gamemode.

curse_terror
Likes: 0
Posts: 3

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to curse_terror

It was not always in the game. It was an added in feature in one of the earlier games. So yes it is right to say since it was added.

HC is not more realistic at all. For people can survive multiple gun shot wounds and live in real life. Getting shot in the foot with one round and dieing is not more realistic.

Soldiers in real life have been shot several times in arms or legs and lived to be healed and then sent back to battle.

trialstardragon Level 70
Likes: 1950
Posts: 12882

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to WKMMS

I do believe aim assist has been removed all together as well as crosshairs for the sniper rifle class. This does add significant emphasis on aiming for those who will be sniping. Hopefully they've also considered spray patterns and movement, like how the jump shot in BOII has ridiculous effect on the weapons pattern, and taken into consideration each weapons unique spray.

dieStrafe
Likes: 0
Posts: 2

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to WKMMS

totally agree with you

frequentbanger2
Likes: 13
Posts: 53

Re: Encouraging Accuracy?

in reply to WKMMS

they wont do it the game makers made there cash off this one and now moved on to 2 more crap games they wouldn't let quick scoping be apart of the game if they gave a crap

slayer0fg0d
Likes: 7
Posts: 79

Studios