Actually no I do not it their burden to prove me incorrect and none of the videos have done so. Not entirely true the person calling someone wrong does not always have to provide why they feel it is wrong. All your facts from the tests that you have seen done does not 100% prove anything. So it does not prove me wrong yet you cannot ever accept that possible outcome. Which is funny really.. for a true tester is willing to see and accept the possible chance that no matter how many tests were done that the information could still be wrong. Because the scientific testing method is not 100% foolproof and never was nor ever will be.
You're a hypocrite. You want other people to prove you wrong (which I did) and you don't want to have to prove anyone else wrong. You have no evidence and have contributed no evidence, yet you're the one who is telling others that they are wrong. Telling someone they wrong about something you know nothing about is about as foolish as you can get. Your penetration theory was disproven by the fact that lmg's have higher penetration and carry their damage through walls longer than an ap pistol, but the lmg still can't shoot through the vest. Your theory that ap rounds get a damage multiplier when hitting the vest is disproven by the fact that no ballistic vest emblem pops up. You even said that the emblem pops up when it is absorbing damage. The ballistic vest has 150 health points. That would mean an ap equipped gun would need to receive a 2.5x multiplier in order to kill in the same amount of bullets. The mtar does 40 damage at close range. If it received a 2.5x multiplier when shooting a vest at close range, then it be doing 100 damage. The vest takes 150 damage so the first shot with an ap mtar would cause a vest emblem to pop up because it is absorbing damage. It is sad that I have had to lay it out for you and even more pathetic that you have made about 10 posts without adding anything. You tried to tell someone they were wrong when you had no evidence and you were proven wrong. Get over it and stop talking about the scientific method. There is not 100% certain proof of anything. Only a moron uses that as an argument to disprove someone else. Try using evidence instead. Any imbecile could sit there and say gravity isn't real and no one could prove them wrong because for all we know there are undetectable ghosts that move objects, right? In the real world, you need evidence. That is something that you are in short supply of.
wherever your stats come from on the amount of damage for the vest may be true in theory but i play tons of s&r and vests are used very frequently there and someone using armor piercing rarely ever gets the vest emblem upon firing at them, it usually negates the vests all together or takes maybe 1 extra bullet on a normal kill.
Armor piercing always negates the vest. The emblem will never pop up if your gun is equipped with ap rounds.
Keep it up you funny ya know.. The vids did not prove anything at all, just because they show a few things does not meant those things are infallible proof of your view point. Only a tool of a fool thinks in that manner.
Just because the emblem does not show up does it meant the ap round just cancels it out as if it was not worn at all.
See that is where you are wrong there is a 100% proof method with this game.. the code itself is 100% proof and only the developers know the full truth on how it works. So yes there is a 100% factual proof out there, which none of the video's can lay claim to as having so they them-self are not 100% factual no matter how many times the tests are done by any number of players ever.
And if it not 100% then it cannot be claimed as proof or true and the way it is when it has not been proven as such by any means.
You so called evidence does not have the proof that you claim it does anymore than may statements saying else have less proof just because I have not provided any video of it. Short of having access to the code itself there is no way for me to prove anything. Same with the vid's they do not really prove anything either but a possible concept of how it may work; but not the actual way it works.
Actually your point about gravity is kind of funny.. for we don't know it exists, and it could be ghosts doing it all.. we only assume it is something called gravity because we were once told it was by someone who claimed them self as a scientist and everyone believed them because of some tests they did which only proved that some unseen forced moved objects.. not what the force was and how it worked. And since the ghost possibility can not be proven since you cant really prove ghosts exists than it must be wrong.. but that does not make it wrong..
People like you are stuck in the logical loop boundaries of what you think is real because if science and tests do not say so then it cannot ever be so.. which is no closer to the truth than anything else ever. You lack imagination or belief that something could be other than what you want to believe it to be because no one has proved otherwise for you yet...
To use your logic..
Does god exist? prove it.
Does he/she not exist? prove it.
You cant do either no matter what you try, no matter what tests you use. So science and testing thing is not 100% or perfect or infallible and never was a never will be but you refuse to ever accept that possible because it is beyond your logical thinking patterns.
If it is not found in logic and proved in logic then it cannot be.. which is a very flawed way to think and live...so keep telling yourself that only your way can be because of your logic and live in your box of logic where you feel safe.
You continue to add absolutely nothing. My last post contained all of the information that you need to know. Feel free to test everything that I said and you will find that it is true. All of your theories were proven wrong. You can debate about something not being 100% true, but the fact is that you have no evidence of anything. I can only imagine how badly you would get laughed at in a debate if you tried to say that someone's evidence was wrong simply because nothing is 100% certain. Your point about the developers knowing for a fact how they work is also untrue. Someone with your mindset could easily argue that you don't know if the computers used to program the game were working properly. Get some evidence to prove your point. You came into this thread and tried to flex your e-muscles by telling people they were wrong. You start petty arguments to try to make yourself feel important. You completely made up how ballistic vests work and you were called out on it.
Oh and BTW stop referencing the video. The facts I stated in my earlier posts were not from the video, but from my own tests. They can all be repeated and yield the same results. Only a fool continues to tell someone they are wrong without providing any evidence.
And yet you are being the fool just by assuming that your evidence cannot be wrong just because you tested it and it worked one way for you. Which does not conclusively prove that is THE way it works but just the way YOU think it does.
You take the time to resurrect a month old thread and still add no evidence. You only criticize my evidence. You don't even have a legitimate criticism in the testing methods or logic. All you can come up with is that nothing is 100%. Use that logic next time you're in a real life argument and see how badly you get laughed it. I guess the Seahawks didn't win the Super Bowl either? It is possible I only dreamed that I saw them win and all of the evidence online could be fake as well. If you want to prove someone wrong, then supply evidence.