LMG's discussion

World War II General Discussion

in reply to mygamertagsucks
FG42 and Bren would be cool, they look badass.
Dante2k Level 75
Likes: 1310
Posts: 2969
Registered: ‎30-11-2016

Yep, I listed those guns too in my guns list, cause they are pretty probable to make it to the final version of the game.

SOH972
Likes: 1
Posts: 30
Registered: ‎01-07-2017

The MG42 wasn't a hip fire weapon so it shouldn't be in the game as a 'run around' weapon.

RalphMalphFTW
Likes: 1
Posts: 4
Registered: ‎01-05-2017
in reply to RalphMalphFTW
People didn't use to hip fire and quick scope sniper rifles either.
Dante2k Level 75
Likes: 1310
Posts: 2969
Registered: ‎30-11-2016
in reply to RalphMalphFTW

That is part of the artistic freedom the devs have.

Like hipfiring bolt action rifles. You can't do that in real life.

 

Roll the dice. Life is a gamble
GRaS is OP. Green Stars are OP
SaND get's everywhere
dtuchpunk Level 75
Likes: 4363
Posts: 14689
Registered: ‎09-06-2011
Highlighted
in reply to RalphMalphFTW

Some variants of the MG42 could be hipfired by really strong soldiers. Nobody complained about that in WAW. Besides, in Battlefield 1 there are soldiers that can hipfire heavy lmg's like the MG08, and battlefield tends to be more realistic than COD. Like some guys also said, quicksoping wasn't possible in ww2 either. If you can hipfire a M1903 in call of duty ww2, why can't you hipfire a MG42 or a Browning M1919? The devs could figure it out.

SOH972
Likes: 1
Posts: 30
Registered: ‎01-07-2017

Studios