I assume most people have seen that both the KAP 40 and B23R had its damage reduced and both had a nerf in hipfire and dual weild department.
My question is, do you think it deserved to nerfed?
I honestly don't think it does because to me they were pretty much perfect. Dual Wield had been nerfed a lot of the KAP 40 in previous patches which brought it in line.
I feel they've just tried to take away the ability to use them as a strong secondary stand alone weapon e.g. use the weapon like a primary instead of its intended role and to be honest the nerfs were that slight according to several videos that it didn't make too much a noticeable difference.
So do you feel they desrved to be nefed?
EDIT: I do want to make clear that the damage up close wasn't changed as such, it was the range damage so it would take 6 shots to kill with the KAP-40 at range and the B23R had a slight damage reduction so you'd need all 3 shots to kill in the head (I think).
Message was edited by: scotland-rules Check Edit section
Nope, just an over reaction to a company that listens to a loud minority of kids that were crying the loudest. People that dont know how to defend against them and died from them. Those who CRY loudest will be heard the most. Its just sad these weak players are changing the game for the rest of us.
It all depends on your personal definition of what an OP weapon is. For me an OP weapon is one that is so good, everybody uses it. If it's a good weapon for getting kills why wouldn't you use it?
I have 25 days played, 45,000 odd deaths in total. 3,392 deaths from the PDW (top of my "deaths by" list), 628 from the B23R, and 256 from the KAP40. Judging just on the maths alone, the KAP40 and B23R are not being used a great deal and the nerf was not necessary IMO.